I'm excited to get my hands on this laptop and put it through our rigorous tests.16-inch MacBook Pro configurations. However, I wouldn't be a good reviewer if I just took the company at its word. Now with my past experience reviewing the 13-inch MacBook Pro M1 laptop, I know better than to doubt Apple's claims - especially when it comes to power and performance. Plus, the Pro brings fast charge to the mix, delivering a 50% charge in only 30 minutes.
Now to be fair, the previous 16-inch system lasted 10 hours and 55 minutes, while the 13-inch MacBook M1 kept the party going for 16:32. That's nice, but the Laptop Mag battery test is a bit more rigorous. While it's safe to assume that the company isn't referencing an AMD Ryseries or an Nvidia RTX 3080, I'm curious to see where Apple drew the line.įor battery life, the MacBook Pro is rated for 21 hours of video playback. Now, keep in mind Apple didn't say which discrete chip they're comparing against. Apple claims that the Pro will perform 2.3 times faster a discrete chip while the Max will be 3.3 times faster. When it comes to graphics, depending on the chip, you can either get 16 graphics cores in the Pro and 32 graphics cores in the Max. Apple claims that the chips are more than 7 times faster than integrated chips while using 70% less power. Sporting eight high-performance cores and a pair of energy efficient cores, each already surpasses the M1 chip of the MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro (4 high-performance, 4 energy efficiency). And judging by the specs, this might be the most powerful chip in the land (for now). This is all well and good, but what people are really here for (myself included) is the new M1 Pro and Max chips.
0 kommentar(er)
